Ching-Yuan Wu, 
Peking University 


This paper discusses a widely accepted emendation to an earlier version of IG X 2.1 137. Early draft copies of the Herennia announcement show that Antoninus Pius was hailed as Σωτήρ by the city of Thessalonike, a rare epithet for this emperor. This reading was later replaced due to an expert’s claim that σωτῆρος has to be read σωτηρίας. Since this seems to conform to a well-known salutary formula, the emendation was adopted from then on. This paper suggests that the reading of σωτῆρος is based on reliable and published reports instead, and ought to be preferred over the expert claim. Empirical evidence is given to support reading σωτῆρος. 

Keywords: testamentary munus, epigraphy, emendation, Thessalonike, Antoninus Pius 

Sign Up for Our Newsletters

Get notified with new publications or articles. Unsubscribe anytime.

You May Also Like

Thucydides’ Account of the Athenian Plague 

Ahn Jaewon, Seoul National University  Abstract  This paper offers a reading of Thucydides’…

Sophocles Philoctetes 1019

Makoto Anzai, Hokkaido University  Abstract and Introduction  The purposes of this short textual…